What
is the main argument being made by the speaker?
I believe Yong Zhao’s main argument is that it is
not enough to reform education; we need to know what the end goal is. What are we trying to create? As Yong Zhao (2012) stated, “If you
chose the wrong goal to measure yourself, if you chose the wrong objective to
go after, no matter how good, how
efficient you are, you are not going to get where you want to go” (ISTE Videos,
2012).
Do
you agree or disagree with his argument?
I completely agree with Mr. Yong Zhao. Education is changing. We know that our students need to be 21st
century thinkers and creators that can compete in a global society. However, as educators, we are lost on what exactly
this goal is and how to measure student success at it. Even as the United States recognizes that
educational reform is crucial, as a country, we are still concerned with who’s
on top but, as Zhao stated, “To the top of what” (ISTE Videos, 2012)? Instead of focusing on the
process, we are concerned of only measuring the end result.
Make
connections between the ideas presented in this Keynote and concepts explored
in this course.
“Test scores
may just be like the giant stone heads . . . they look beautiful, they look
nice, they’re seductive but they don’t really lead to real education, what we
need (ISTE Videos, 2012). Too often we
look at test scores, and other means of assessments, as an evaluation or
judgement of a child’s work. However,
assessments can be so much more powerful.
As Alvermann, Hagood, & Williams (2001) stated, there is an “important
relationship between instruction and assessment” (Alvermann, Hagood, &
Williams, 2001, pg. 1). When used to
inform and drive instruction, assessment can help
teach students to become critical consumers of their work and the work of
others. “Students learn to assess texts rhetorically-their own texts and
the texts of others, as they compose and after they do so. In this way,
assessments of student work become part of instruction” (Alvermann,
Hagood, & Williams, 2001, pg 2).
According to Yong Zaho (2012), China did not
celebrate when the PISA results showed that they had topped the worldwide list
in math, science, and reading testing because they had a different goal in
mind. They are facing an economic
transition from ship labor to innovation and they do not believe their current
education system can help them make this transition. In
actuality, according to Yong Zaho’s (2012) research, there is a negative
correclation between PISA scores and entrepreneur scores (ISTE Videos, 2012). Yet even though, American students do much
more poorly in math, they actually have more confidence than Chinese
students. “Asian countries look at the
lack of confidence as a problem because confidence underpins creativity and entrepreneurship,
underpins the drive to be innovative,” (ISTE Videos, 2012) a skill needed to
meet the demands of their changing economy.
Like China, America is experiencing "fundamental changes in the economy, jobs, and businesses (that)
have reshaped industry and the nature of work” (NCTE, 2009, pg. 15). It is great that our students feel confident
in their abilities but this confidence must transfer to technology as well. Multimodal instruction fills this need
because it “is comprised of multiple modes or communicative forms (i.e.,
digital, visual, spatial, musical, etc.) within various sign systems that carry
meanings recognized and understood by a social collective (Sanders &
Albers, n.d., pg 8).
“Now some literacy experts want the federal tests known
as the nation’s report card to include a digital reading component” (Rich, 2008,
para. 61), however, is this truly what we need in educational reform? In Yong
Zhao’s speech (2012), he states, “If you want to compete over one thing, over
test scores I can bet you, like me, I did, in those impoverished classrooms, I
can do this but that is reducing a 10,000 dollar education to a 10 dollar
education” (ISTE Videos, 2012). Does the gap between test
scores matter? What are we trying to
measuring and are our current evaluations measuring this task? What does the future
require? Rather than focusing on
standards-based test scores, we should be focusing on how to best help “people
to critically evaluate and cultivate best practices” (Greenhow & Gleason,
2012, pg 463) in regards to preparing our students for entrepreneurial minded
careers.
Resources
Alvermann,
D., Hagood, M., and Williams, K. (2001,
June). Image, language, and sound: Making meaning with popular culture texts. Reading Online, 4(11). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newliteracies/action/alvermann/index.html
Greenhow, C. & Gleason, B. (2012).
Twitteracy: Tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational
Forum, 76, 463-477. http://www.kdp.org/publications/theeducationalforum/pdf/TEF764_Greenhow_Gleason%20%282%29.pdf
ISTE Videos. (Producer). (2012,
July 9). ISTE 2012 Tuesday keynote featuring
Yong Zhao. [You Tube video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKXeNKsjoMI
National
Council of Teachers of English. (2009).
Literacy leaning in the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Magazine/CC0183_Brief_Literacy.pdf
Rich, M. (2008). Literacy debate: Online, r u really reading? New York Times.
Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Sanders, J. and Albers, P. (n.d.) Multimodal literacies:
An introduction. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ZnRBedCgj_IJ:https://secure.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Books/Sample/32142Intro_x.pdf+are+literacies+and+Discourses+used+interchanably&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjE9pBd2JmN_g_xuDVosAj01ImYkr6u-oyjriG0tREXG8fzwbyeuhcmDw0rrbTA1rug-bgizHwuiUlocJcQwdvcCiPOxZYWVExNgQ8BmulksyeRUcUX4LJmfxLlw7e8UTdG2TuT&sig=AHIEtbSZ7RHTNL_Rfe2bglUQRg9zzCD2JA