Does Digital Media Make Us
Bad Writers?
I was surprised when I read
Karp’s (2010) statement, “But maybe the most surprising thing to the gotcha
gang is that while the type of error changed, the ratio of errors to words has
held steady for more than 100 years” (para. 3). I have been under the assumption that grammatical
errors in writing have increased since the development of texting and social
media sites. In my own classroom, I have
seen an increase of abbreviations (b/c, lol, bff, k, etc.) and misspellings in
my students’ formal writings. However, I
had not taken into consideration that maybe grammatical errors haven’t
increased but merely changed as stated in this article.
Literacy Debate: Online, R U
Really Reading?
It is very difficult for me
to stay objective on this topic because I am such an avid reader. Unlike television, I agree that “spending
time on the Web, whether it is looking up something on Google or even
brittneyspears.org, entails some engagement with text” (Rich, 2008, para. 8). Some reading is better than no reading at
all. However, I believe reading novels
is the best way to build reading comprehension and written language skills.
Web Evangelist or
Traditionalist?
I believe I fall somewhere
in the middle of the Web Evangelist and Traditionalist continuum. While I strongly endorse the reading of
novels, I do realize that education (as well as literacy) is transforming into
something completely new. By 2020, the research firm,
CompTIA, projects that the total number of IT jobs in the United States will
jump by 22 percent (Sampson, 2013).
Digital literacy, the ability to use technology, communication tools or
networks, to locate, evaluate, use, and create information (University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008), will be an essential skill our students
need. However, I do not believe it
should come in expense to deep, reflective reading skills developed by novel
reading.
The article, “Is Google Making
Us Stupid” supports my belief that reading novels is still an important reading
skill. In this article, Nicolas Carr
states that his mind is changing. He use
to find reading books or lengthy articles easy and would spend many hours
thinking about the writing style. Now
after reading only a few pages, he can no longer concentrate. He contributes this to the availability of
instant research through digital means.
While he acknowledges that this instant flow of information has its
advantages, Carr believes it has also come at a price. Rather than delving into information, the
internet has encouraged “skimming” techniques.
Digital media offers a different kind of reading and therefore requires
a different type of thinking. With
digital media, “Our ability to interpret text, to make the
rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction,
remains largely disengaged” (Carr, 2008, para. 8). This is why I
believe I fall into the middle spectrum of the Web Evangelist-Traditionalist
debate. I think we should take a balanced
approach to teaching literacy. Our
students need the best of both worlds in order to succeed in the new digital
world.
References
Rich, M. (2008). Literacy debate: Online, r u
really reading? New York Times.
Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Sampson, T. (2013). Software developers expected
to see the highest IT job growth come 2020. [Blog]. Retrieved from
http://www.infoworld.com/t/it-jobs/software-developers-expected-see-the-highest-it-job-growth-come-2020-212709
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
(2008). What is digital literacy? Retrieved from
http://www.library.illinois.edu/diglit/definition.html